New section on why to prefer SRC over bare RCS.

diff --git a/FAQ.asc b/FAQ.asc
index 496e06d4b6c99449556f0c63b214844447e7b633..faeb1d171a045b96f775219bd5d23aec801b0dbd 100644 (file)
--- a/FAQ.asc
+++ b/FAQ.asc
@@ -74,6 +74,19 @@ a public https://gitorious.org/src-vcs/[Git repository].
 SRC has real users (that is, other than the author) since day
 two after it as announced, but not for projects like itself.
 
+[[bare-rcs]]
+== I still use plain RCS for single files. Why move to SRC? ==
+
+Because process friction matters, even to hackers as ancient as 
+you and the author of RCS. Bare RCS's interface is pretty awful;
+a competently-designed UI can reduce that friction considerably.
+Try it and see.
+
+If you use RCS through Emacs's VC mode, you already have a pretty
+good wrapper around it...which, as it happens, the author of RCS
+also wrote.  SRC has a couple of advantages over VC-RCS - running
+lockless and better scriptability are the main ones.
+
 [[beginners-vcs]]
 == Is SRC a good system on which to learn about version control? ==
 
@@ -167,6 +180,4 @@ encapsulated in a class...
 [[ack]]
 == Acknowledgments ==
 
-Nearly all of this FAQ, except <<not-a-joke,This is a joke, right?>>
-and <<self-hosting,Is SRC used to develop itself?>>, was written by
-Mike Swanson, aka chungy.
+Most of this FAQ was originally written by Mike Swanson, aka chungy.