<!ENTITY findroot SYSTEM "../madhouse/findroot.mad">
<!ENTITY transfunc SYSTEM "../madhouse/transfunc.mad">
<!ENTITY matrixmult SYSTEM "../madhouse/matrixmult.mad">
+<!ENTITY factfunc SYSTEM "../madhouse/factfunc.mad">
<!ENTITY scope1 SYSTEM "scope1.xml">
<!ENTITY scope2 SYSTEM "scope2.xml">
<!ENTITY scope3 SYSTEM "scope3.xml">
<para>Label arrays, array-mode variables, and the associated
computed-transfer statement are not implemented (mainly because the
manual did not include programs with which they could be tested).
-Neither are multiple ENTRY points, EQUIVALENCE, TAPE, or DRUM
-statements.</para>
+Neither are multiple ENTRY points, EQUIVALENCE, ERASABLE, COMMON,
+TAPE, or DRUM statements.</para>
<para>Only the no-argument case of ERROR RETURN is supported. The
language describing the more general case of this feature is deeply
<!-- beginpage -->
<sect2><title>Input-Output Statements</title>
+<note><para> The Retrocomputing Museum implementation does not
+implement TAPE and DRUM statements.</para></note>
+
<para>In this section the follwing definition the following
definitions will hold. &scriptF; is the location of a format
specification vector (see <xref linkend='format_specs'/>) which must
occurrence of any elements from any two arrays in the same perentheses
implies equating the entire arrays accordingly.</para>
+<note><para> The Retrocomputing Museum implementation does not
+implement EQUIVALENCE.</para></note>
+
</sect2>
<sect2><title>ERASABLE Declaration</title>
It should be understood that this storage is accessible to, andmay be
used by, subroutines.</para>
+<note><para>This declaration is a memory-footprint optimization hack.
+The Retrocomputing Museum implementation does not implement
+it.</para></note>
+
</sect2>
<sect2><title>3.6 PROGRAM COMMON Declaration</title>
must be loaded into the computer first </emphasis> if PROGRAM COMMON
is used at all.</para>
+<note><para> The Retrocomputing Museum implementation does not
+implement COMMON.</para></note>
+
</sect2>
<sect2><title>Presetting Vectors</title>
</programlisting>
</sect2>
<!-- pagebreak; -->
+<sect2><title><emphasis>Problem:</emphasis> Evaluate the recursive function,</title>
+
+<note><para>Due to a reproduction error in the original, the Analysis
+paragraph below is somewhat mangled (the right-hand side sliced
+off). Italicized text in the paragraph is a best guess as to what it
+actually said.</para></note>
+
+<para><emphasis>Analysis:</emphasis> This is the definition of n!
+Alth<emphasis>ough it could have been implemented</emphasis> directly
+using a THROUGH statement, <emphasis>instead the function will
+</emphasis> be evaluated using its recursive def<emphasis>inition to
+illustrate</emphasis> how recursive functions can be
+handl<emphasis>ed.</emphasis></para>
+
+<programlisting>
+&factfunc;
+</programlisting>
+<!-- pagebreak; -->
+
+</sect2>
</sect1>
</chapter>
</book>