From: Eric S. Raymond <esr@thyrsus.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 21:59:11 +0000 (-0500)
Subject: Documentation fixes.
X-Git-Tag: 0.9~18
X-Git-Url: http://thyrsus.com/gitweb/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=8a0fd830b0f9260e6e35e0397f1ba842b335b959;p=src.git

Documentation fixes.
---

diff --git a/FAQ.asc b/FAQ.asc
index faeb1d1..707e0a0 100644
--- a/FAQ.asc
+++ b/FAQ.asc
@@ -78,14 +78,15 @@ two after it as announced, but not for projects like itself.
 == I still use plain RCS for single files. Why move to SRC? ==
 
 Because process friction matters, even to hackers as ancient as 
-you and the author of RCS. Bare RCS's interface is pretty awful;
+you and the author of SRC. Bare RCS's interface is pretty awful;
 a competently-designed UI can reduce that friction considerably.
 Try it and see.
 
 If you use RCS through Emacs's VC mode, you already have a pretty
-good wrapper around it...which, as it happens, the author of RCS
+good wrapper around it...which, as it happens, the author of SRC
 also wrote.  SRC has a couple of advantages over VC-RCS - running
-lockless and better scriptability are the main ones.
+lockless, better scriptability, and ditching RCS's awful revision
+numbering are the main ones.
 
 [[beginners-vcs]]
 == Is SRC a good system on which to learn about version control? ==