From bcb450f8c631885e8c599bec4c14511fc10bbdca Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Eric S. Raymond" Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 07:14:51 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] More FAQ polishing. --- FAQ.asc | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/FAQ.asc b/FAQ.asc index bbcd2ff..1cb0352 100644 --- a/FAQ.asc +++ b/FAQ.asc @@ -66,7 +66,6 @@ respect to the reasons SRC exists. [[beginners-vcs]] == Is SRC a good system on which to learn about version control? == -======= *YES*! SRC is explicitly designed to have the bare-bones features and commands of a modern version control system. Keep in mind that SRC’s @@ -146,7 +145,7 @@ original design. Resurrect RCS? Wrap it in a decent UI? _Really?_ There's a significant amount of ha-ha-only-serious here. Laugh, but treat SRC as a lesson in several things. Unix minimalism. The virtue of re-use, even of technology as old as RCS. The effectiveness of a -carefully designed UI. The value of a conservative design with no +carefully crafted UI. The value of a conservative design with no surprises and no undue cleverness. What *will* be funny is when we implement the back end to talk to -- 2.43.0